Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Narrative wesbite review


Software/Website Title: Phonetics - The Sounds of Spoken Language


Grade/Age Level:  not suitable for young children because of jargon

Language & Content: American English, Spanish, and German pronunciation


The purpose of this site is to show the places of articulation for American English, Spanish, and German. I have only used the American English, but other friends of mine who are language teachers were really excited when I introduced them to this site. This review will only focus on the American English content. This website is useful or effective for self-study or guided study of pronunciation.

One recently added feature is an interactive diagram of the articulatory anatomy to help familiarize students with the vocabulary such as alveolar ridge, teeth, lips, epiglottis, etc. Actually, one of the drawbacks or weak points of this site is that students must have some knowledge of vocabulary like ‘fricative’ or ‘glide’ to find the sound, and then the sounds are written in IPA symbols, which is good from the perspective of a linguist, but possibly frustrating for a lower-level student who is looking for /th/ but does not know the θ symbol. One way I deal with this is by specifically pointing out to the students that inside the front cover of our pronunciation book (not in any way affiliated with this website) is an easy-to-understand chart of IPA symbols and the corresponding sounds. I also use the IPA symbols in class for the sounds we are working on to help make them comfortable with the IPA symbols.

Another weak point is that unfortunately, the website does not offer feedback or assessment for the students. Due to the nature of pronunciation, such feedback or assessment would be quite difficult as opposed to a grammar website where such quizzing or assessment would be technologically easier.  

As a linguist, I appreciate the thoroughness of the step-by-step pronunciation description of the pronunciation. The layout is easy to navigate if you know the vocabulary. Although the website does not say when this was updated, I am fairly sure that this is a 2011 update because I regularly use this site in my Communication or pronunciation classes, and I do not remember seeing this feature until very recently.  Although I mentioned before that a weak point of this site is that the vocabulary and IPA symbols can be intimidating or confusing to lower-level learners, I also think it is a strong point that the website uses the proper professional terminology. For example, the ‘sh’ sounds can be seen with different spellings such as shoe, sugar, mission, education, and others, so ‘sh’ might seem like an easy way to represent the sound to lower-level learners, but the spelling is not always ‘sh’, so the IPA symbol /ʃ / is really more appropriate. Why not start them out by learning the proper symbols?


The two main attractions for me that I specifically demonstrate to my students are the cross-section view of the mouth and the frontal view of the mouth. The cross-section view of the mouth is a great way to show students tongue position or the difference between voiced and voiceless sounds. The frontal view has a short video clip of a woman producing the sounds, which is particularly helpful for sounds like /f/ or /v/ for the teeth placement on the lower lip and for /th/ to demonstrate for students that their tongues really do need to come put past the teeth.

This animation and the short video of the frontal pronunciation really hook the students. They like being able to click the words and hear the pronunciation, and being able to click on the sounds and see the pronunciation as they listen. It makes pronunciation learning more interactive and interesting. Students each have individual pronunciation goals, and this features help to keep them engaged while working individually or with teacher supervision.

Another strong point is that they provide a sample of the sound in initial, medial, and final positions. For example, for the / θ/ sound, thing, toothbrush, and with are the example words.  This is helpful because some students have difficulty producing or perceiving sounds in different positions. I have a student right now who often pronounces initial /θ/ as /t/ and final /θ/ as /f/. Hopefully, listening to the sounds in the different word positions might help to hear what she should be pronouncing.  Another point I like is that the voiced and voiceless pairs are presented together as pairs, which makes it easy to compare the difference between /f/ and /v/, for example, especially because they can see the frontal view and also the vocal cord vibrations.

As for improvements, it should be nice if there were more links, but the site is quite thorough and is a complete resource in and of itself. Another improvement would be to include an IPA symbol chart. Fortunately, the pronunciation book my program uses has such a page, but the site would be harder to maneuver through for student without easy access to the IPA symbol chart.

Overall, I highly recommend this site, and my colleagues to whom I have recommended this site have been pleased.



Phonetics website evaluation checklist




Checklist for Evaluating Web Sites
Why evaluate Web sites? No one has judged the quality or accuracy of the information found on the World Wide Web before you come across it, so you must evaluate the information you find. Some sites are created by experts; for example the UM Libraries' Web site is authored by librarians who have expertise in the field of information science. The vast majority of World Wide Web sites are designed and authored by non-experts.
IMPORTANT NOTE:
This page is designed so that you can type in your answers and then immediately print a copy for your instructor. Alternately, you may print a copy and write in your answers by hand. This page is not constructed to 'save' your answers should you decide to email this page to your instructor.
DIRECTIONS
  1. Carefully read through and answer each question directly on this Web page.
  2. After filling out the page, print it and hand it in to your instructor.
  3. Attach a printout of the first page of the Web site you are evaluating to the Checklist.
Top of Form
What is the URL or Web address of the Web site you are evaluating?

http://
What is the title of the Web site?

AUTHORITY AND ACCURACY
Anyone who knows a little HTML coding and has access to a server can create and load a Web site. It is important to find out who is the author and what are the author's qualifications or expertise, in order to determine the credibility and reliability of the information.
Who is the author of the Web site?
I couldn't tell.
The author is:
What authorship clues did the URL (Web address) provide? Check all that apply:

company (.com)
academic institution (.edu)
U.S. Government agency (.gov)
U.S. military site (.mil)
network of computers (.net)

non-profit organization (.org)
country-sponsored site (e.g., .uk)
personal Web page (e.g., www.jamieoliver.com)
Other? Please describe:
What are the qualifications of the author or group that created the site?
I couldn't find this information.
The author's qualifications are:
PURPOSE AND CONTENT
Determine the purpose of the Web site by looking closely at the content of the information. Some sites provide links to information (e.g., About Our Organization or a Mission Statement) detailing the purpose in creating the Web site, while the purpose of others might not be obvious at first. Take the time to thoroughly explore a Web site to determine if the information is mostly subjective (biased or opinionated), objective (factual) or mixed.
What is the purpose of the Web page or site? Check all that apply:
a personal Web page.
a company or organization Web site.
a forum for educational/public service information.
a forum for scholarly/research information.
for entertainment.
an advertisement or electronic commerce.
a forum for ideas, opinions or points of view.
Other? Please explain:
In your own words, briefly describe the purpose of the Web site.
What does the Web site provide? Check one:
Balanced, objective or factual information.
Biased, subjective or opinionated statements.
(Are the arguments well supported? Yes. No.)
Both objective and subjective information.
I couldn't tell.
Other? Please explain:
Does the Web site provide any contact information or means of communicating with the author or Webmaster?
No.
Yes, the site provides:
CURRENCY
The currency or regularity of updating information is vital for some types of Web sites, and not so important for others. For example, Web sites that provide historical information, such as the presidential papers of George Washington, do not have to be updated as often as sites that provide news stories or stock market information.
When was the Web site last revised, modified or updated?
I couldn't tell.
It was updated:
Is currency important to the type of information available on this Web site?
Yes. Please explain:

No. Please explain:
Is the site well-maintained?
I couldn't tell.
Yes.
No.
Are links broken (Error 404 messages)?
I couldn't tell.
Yes.
No.
DESIGN, ORGANIZATION AND EASE OF USE
Design, organization and ease of use are important considerations. Web sites can provide useful sources of information. However, if they are slow to load or difficult to navigate, search and read, then their contribution and usefulness will be lost.
In your opinion, how does the Web site appear overall? Check all that apply:

Well designed and organized.
Easy to read and navigate.
HELP screens are available.
A search feature/site map is available.

Poorly designed and organized.
Difficult to read and navigate.
HELP screens are unavailable.
A search feature/site map is unavailable.
Bottom of Form

Friday, February 11, 2011

Info from

Hi, all! I thought I would pass on some new info I just received. I subscribe to BYU's concordancing site, and I thought you might be interested in the update I just received. It is free to subscribe to, and if you are a faculty member with your name on a website that can verify this status, you can get more access than just being a regular member. For example, I had to provide the url for my IEP's website listing me as faculty.

Happy concordancing!!






There are two new resources for the registered users of the corpora at http://corpus.byu.edu (COCA, COHA, TIME, BYU-BNC, and Spanish and Portuguese corpora):

1. You can now see "concordance" views, which are similar to those from WordSmith and similar programs. The concordance view allows you to sort the Keyword in Context (KWIC) entries alphabetically -- by up to three different words to the left and/or right of the search word. All of the nearby words are also color-coded for part of speech, which allows you to see interesting patterns in the data. To do a concordance search, just select [KWIC] and [ALPHABETICAL] when you do your search. For more information and lots of examples, please see http://corpus.byu.edu/concordances.asp.

2. At http://www.wordfrequency.info/free.asp, you can now download a free word list that contains *500,000* words -- all words that occur at least four times in COCA (the Corpus of Contemporary American English: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca).

And as always, a friendly reminder to those who have published articles based on the corpora. It takes just 40-50 seconds to enter this information after you log into any of the corpora, and your participation would be greatly appreciated.


Richards and Rogers (2001)
“This requires that the teachers ‘abandon the idea of the teacher as the ‘knower’ and concentrate instead on the idea of the learner as the ‘discoverer’” (Willis, 1990, as cited in Richards and Rogers, 2001, p. 136)
I think the quote above is the most striking quote from this section that captures the spirit of teaching students how to use corpus-based language tools. The article covers the various theories on how learners process words whether in chunks or as units and how these ‘words’ become a part of their target language.  The teacher’s role in this process is not to simply give the students lists of words to memorize like blocks to build a wall, but the use of concordancers and other corpus-based linguistic tools can help the students discover for themselves how words are used in various contexts and also what other words frequently appear with them. I truly wish these tools would have existed in my early days of language study!! The teacher enables the student to be their own ’discourse analyst” (p. 137), which is a valuable skill for language progress. This is yet another example of the ‘teach a man to fish, he’ll eat for day, but teach him how to fish, he’ll eat forever’ saying.


Johns (1991)
The Johns (1991) article, although 20 years old now, still holds valuable information. It would be interesting to see an updated version of this article, but the idea is about corpus-based language tools, concordancers, and the connection between form and function for grammar and vocabulary teaching.  I think this connection between concordancers and grammar class is a useful one for my own teaching because in general, I think of writing class when I think of concordancers, but pairing them with grammar class is a wonderful pairing of need and tool.

Both of these articles are quite timely for me as I just attended a workshop lead by my colleague on how he uses concordancers in his classroom. I definitely will incorporate teaching how to use concordancers in my future classes.


Please forgive the late posting. I have been battling a wicked sore throat and horrible cold all week. Thanks to Nyquil, my concentration span has been reduced to that of a sleepy baby for most of the week! Hope you all are well!!